SPORTS TRIBUNE | Saturday, December 9, 2000, Chandigarh, India |
Closing gender gap in
sports Kirti’s demand on ‘disclosed incomes’ A hobby that costs FIDE President $ 4
m Cricket site brings kudos to
kids |
|
Closing gender gap in
sports IS the gender gap closing in sports? Women are now beating world records held by men 10-15 years back. If Greene, the fastest man on earth, did 100-metres in 9.8 at the Sydney Olympics, Marion Jones, the fastest woman on earth, took only 10.75 seconds. Whereas it took men 75 years to knock 25 minutes off the marathon record, women have done it in 15 years. The English Channel crossing record for both men and women is currently held by a woman swimmer. No wonder the feminist demand for social and economic equality with men is now joined by a call for “athletic equality” or “physical equality”. Possibly the strongest plea for it is made by Colette Dowling in her latest book The Frailty Myth (Random House). Earlier, Dowling had argued that women have an unconscious tendency to make themselves emotionally dependent on men. This time she makes out that it’s culture not nature, that is inhibiting women from being as active as men or having their athletic achievements taken as seriously. “For centuries women have been shackled to a perception of themselves as weak and ineffectual,” says the author. Hers is a plea for the freedom for women to enjoy the strength of their bodies whether at the playing fields or walking down the streets. The apparent disparity in athletic achievement between boys and girls, she argues, has nothing to do with innate ability and everything to do with training and expectation —only if girls “got out of the doll corner” and practiced like boys. It’s another matter whether girls should be spending as much time as boys in kicking or throwing a ball, when their own type of play develops them empathy and imagination. Dowling, however, concedes that boys and girls may experience competition differently — and so a difference in motivation. For example, one of the things teenage girls like about sports is winning the approval of others, whereas boys simply want to win. Surely the history of women’s participation in sports is dispiriting. As late as hundred years back it was thought that active sports could harm women’s reproductive potential, anyway compromise their femininity. In the Olympics itself, right till 1948 women’s track events were limited to races under 100 metres, evidently on the assumption that women weren’t “fit” to run longer distances. When bicycling became a rage, women were discouraged from cycling; some fearing it would afford them unwelcome mobility, others disapproved of women developing the aggressive look of “bicycle face”. The twentieth century has seen a growing presence of women in sports (female athletes constituted, 40 per cent of participants at the Sydney Olympics). Yet sexism in sport remains a reality. Women’s representation in the administrative hierarchy of the International Olympic Committee is disappointingly small. Similarly, majority of members on sport governing bodies at the international and national levels tend to be men. And whatever female officials are present, they mostly fulfil stereotyped role, such as physiotherapist, masseuse, and hostess. Even in a game such as badminton where female participation nearly equals that of males, women form a small minority among its senior administrators. The media coverage of women’s events has a long way to go, too. Not only it is far below what’s justified by women’s participation, the coverage itself “sexualises” them, focussing more on gender than performance. “Stop looking up the undies,” pleads the spokesperson of an Australian woman’s group at Sydney. And cut out sexist reporting like that of a male tennis linesman saying, “I can’t concentrate while standing behind such and such female players”. Or talking of sweat showing in the nether regions. In the recent words of the IOC President Juan Antonio Samaranch, “the problem of women athletes is solved”. But then one can’t help mentioning that the first women’s marathon was not held till 1984. Even today women are not allowed boxing or wrestling events at the Olympics. At a more fundamental level there is much evidence to suggest that within society in general there is a perception that being a woman and being an athlete are incompatible. This is complemented by a perception within sport that to be a woman is to be an inadequate athlete and to be a successful woman athlete is to be an inadequate woman. For men participation in sport confirms and enhances their sexuality but for women participation undermines and questions their sexuality. Women are required to establish their sexuality through a “sex test” and culturally by having to demonstrate that their interest in sport does not detract from their commitment to heterosexual relationships, marriage and family life. Dowling argues that the frailty myth blights women’s lives in other spheres outside the field of competitive sport. From lack of exercise they miss on a few welcome structural changes in the brain. Anyway exercise is known to ward off depression. Again there’s the link between inactivity on the part of younger women and osteoporosis among the elderly. Dowling’s feminine ideal is a kind of ponytail
Amazon who breast-feeds her baby at the sidelines of the soccer field, as Joy Fawcett of the United States team had done. Or the six-footer basketball player Angeles Sparks sneering at weakling male predators. The image of a muscular woman can evoke some uneasy emotions deep down in males, as if she was trying to become a man. Will muscles do away with the last traces of a woman’s vulnerability — so endearing to many men? And what if women hurt themselves in trying to do what nature didn’t intend them to do? Yet the athletic woman exudes a certain charm and confidence. There’s nothing apologetic about her hard-earned muscles, something that her mother didn’t have. In athletes we recognise women who own their bodies, inhabiting every inch of it. The sight of it can be quite sexy. And then the likes of tennis players Sabatini or Anna Kournikova, combining both muscles and looks. Maybe, another ideal of female beauty is emerging, the athletic female body. |
Kirti’s demand on ‘disclosed incomes’ Former cricketer-turned-member of Parliament (MP) Kirti Azad wants the government to make Indian players — who allegedly used a scheme for tax evaders to declare illegal incomes three years ago —disclose the source of those incomes. “All kinds of rumours are afloat that one of the cricketers had then declared a sum of Rs160 million under the voluntary disclosure of income scheme (VDIS),” Azad said. Azad’s demand comes in the wake of many Indian players being accused of match-fixing. The VDIS was launched in 1997 to mop up part of India’s black economy. The scheme stipulated a flat taxation rate of 30 per cent on all incomes disclosed under the scheme. It also granted anonymity and immunity from prosecution to those who made the disclosures. “We don’t want to know how much income they declared under VDIS,” said Azad, when reminded of the anonymity clause. “All that a player needs to do, if he used the VDIS, is to give an affidavit telling us where he got that money from,” added Azad, a member of the victorious Indian team that lifted the World Cup in 1983. Now a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP, last week Azad raised the issue in the Lok Sabha, demanding a disclosure of the players’ incomes, asking the Income Tax Department to open their bank accounts. Former Indian cricket captain Mohammed Azharuddin, former one-day star Ajay Jadeja and former test cricketer Ajay Sharma are among the players, including overseas players, termed guilty of match-fixing by the CBI. “The media has also said these cricketers have property worth tens of millions,” said Azad, adding, “this needs to be exposed.” Having raised the issue once in the Lok Sabha last week, Azad said he had given notice for a fuller discussion on the issue and expected it to be taken-up this week or next week. His demand adds another twist to the eight-month-old scandal that broke out when the Delhi Police booked former South African captain Hansie Cronje for match-fixing on the basis of his telephonic conversations with a bookie. Though the CBI probe — that followed the hue and cry and was revealed in October — found these players guilty of match-fixing, the investigative agency disfavoured prosecution, saying charges against the players would not sustain due to a lack of evidence. A separate probe by former CBI official, K. Madhavan, on behalf of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) made on November-end, virtually echoed the CBI’s findings. “Al Capone, the big gangster of California, could never be caught for his crimes,” said Azad when reminded that both the CBI’s and the cricket board’s own investigations had found the law inadequate to prosecute the errant players. “But even he was booked on the basis of an obscure tax violation case and taken in,” Azad added, suggesting a similar remedy to tackle the current problem. The BCCI imposed life bans on Azharuddin and former cricketer Ajay Sharma on Tuesday for their alleged involvement in match-fixing. It also debarred cricketers Ajay Jadeja and Manoj Prabhakar from playing any official matches for five years while exonerating Nayan Mongia. Azad believes the match-fixing scandal is only the tip of the iceberg. “People had been talking about match-fixing even before the Cronje episode came up. After he accepted, people started believing something happened,” he said. But Azad warned against the continued limbo saying the media trial in the absence of any firm action on the part of the BCCI would be harmful to the game. — India Abroad News Service |
A hobby that costs FIDE President $ 4
m KAMYKIA is not really the most happening country nor are people across the world queuing up to go there for a holiday. In fact, the chances are that a majority of Indians do not even know, if at all, where it is on the map. But for those who do have an interest in chess, it is not an unfamiliar country. For it has an interesting man, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, as its President, who also happens to be the President of the FIDE, the world chess body. Kalmykia happens to be the only Buddhist country in Europe and was once a part of the erstwhile Soviet Union. Now where does chess figure in the scheme of things for this young businessman, whose personal wealth is believed to run into billions. So much so that he calls conducting and financing a world chess championships like the one currently underway in New Delhi, as a personal hobby. “People love collecting paintings, cars and so on. I love chess and it is my main hobby. I love spending money on sponsoring it,” says Ilyumzhinov, through an interpreter. Pray, how much does this hobby cost him ? A mere $ 4 million! “I have spent close to $ 4 million of my own money for these championships,” he announces without a trace of regret or arrogance. Each year Ilyumzhinov’s country sends a few youngsters to study in India. And he hopes that will encourage bilateral relations between the two countries. But meanwhile can we request Ilyumzhinov to send a few Ilyumzhinovs. Indian sport badly needs some. This is the third edition of the FIDE’s World Knock-out Chess Championships. But women are having their own event alongside for the first time. Unfortunately just like in the men’s section, the strongest women’s player, Hungarian Judit Polgar, has stayed away. So have her two sisters, Sophia and Zsuzsa, who form the most formidable chess trio in the world. However, the defending champion, Xie Jun of China, whose planned title-match with Judit Polgar never really took off, is here. The women’s field has a lot of young contenders, but two ladies, who hold a considerable amount of spotlight are the veterans Maya Chiburdanidze and Nona Gaprindashvili. The two former women’s world champions, are legends in women’s chess. Chiburdanidze in fact has played in New Delhi in the mid-1980s, when the Indian capital used to have regular GM tournaments like the now-defunct Bhilwara GM tournament. Talking of the Bhilwara chess tournaments in New Delhi, Pravin Thipsay and Dibyendu Barua will have fond memories of them. Back in 1982, the two had completed their international master titles in the same event that year. Those days there were just a handful of international masters in India. But now when there are more than two dozen, the number of good GM tournaments has come down. At least in New Delhi, which has not had one since the 1990 Triveni Grandmasters event where the title was shared by Viswanathan Anand and Gata Kamsky. Judit Polgar, too, played in that event. Monday was not a very happy day for either Barua or Thipsay. While Barua playing the event lost to Evegeny Vladimirov of Kazhakstan, Thipsay’s wife, Bhagyashree Sathe Thipsay lost her first game to Chinese-born Dutch player, Peng Zhaoqin. Besides helping his wife, Thipsay is also the AICF’s representative to help in media affairs for the championships. Interestingly, the Triveni Group of Industries which sponsored that 1990 GM event is owned by Dhruv Sawhney, who became the president of the All-India Chess Federation around that time. Maybe, it is time for the affable and suave Sawhney to come up with a couple of more events like that. Perhaps it is also time, he took up chess as a more serious hobby, just the way FIDE President Ilyumzhinov has ! Maybe not to the same tune of money, but a mere fraction of that will do.
— UNI |
|
Cricket site brings kudos to
kids When cricket-crazy Karan Mahajan, then 13, and his younger brother Shiv (11), launched their own web site back in 1997, they never imagined there could be money in it. That was till January. Life changed for the two when Britain-based Rivals.com, a major sports network, took note of their “Indian Cricket Fever” site. “We received a surprise offer in our mailbox. Rivals.com wanted us to become their official Indian cricket providers. A few weeks later, we had a 20-page contract stuffed in our postal mailbox. The really exciting part of the offer was its monetary implications — we would get paid £ 200 a month plus 50 per cent of ad revenue earned from the site, not to mention a stock option in Rivals.com and a free dotcom address,” said Karan. Ironically, the “fever” caught on when the two brothers, students of Delhi’s Modern School, were getting weary of their pet project. “We had only earned $ 25 till then from the site, which required us to update the site almost every single day to keep pace with the Indian cricket team’s exploits, on and off the field,” Karan said. The brothers were chosen by Rivals from over 100 Indian cricket sites for their “singular passion, dedication and web-designing skills”. Since then, the two have developed a new web site and Indian cricket fever moved into its new address: www.indiancricketfever.com to www.indian-cricket-fever.com. Long before Rivals.com zoomed in on the two, their site had been noticed by others. In 1998, when the site was about eight months old, the Webmaster of Compmagic.com had said in an award citation: “I never thought I’d be awarding a sport-related page, but this site is exceptional! Authored by a team of 12 and 14-year-old brothers, it provides the user with content galore in anything related to the game (sport) of cricket. Also included is Indian cricket news, stats on cricket teams, pictures and everything is easy to find, keeping you on the site from start to finish!... I’m sure these kids could give some of the adult webmasters a few good lessons!” Karan says he and Shiv learned web-designing on their own after a friend signed them up for a free Geocites.com account. Computer magazine DQWeek had also published a huge half-page feature on the site. “We were a bit surprised by our own success. The site was growing fast as we approached the 50,000 hits (mark). We were not earning much from the site — we didn’t even have a dotcom address, but the praise from our visitors from over 90 different countries served as a constant source of inspiration.” The association with Rivals may put an end to the kids’ worry about earning. They may well have to start thinking about spending now. —India Abroad News Service |
sm
|