Sunday, July 30, 2000,
Chandigarh, India






THE TRIBUNE SPECIALS
50 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE

TERCENTENARY CELEBRATIONS
M A I N   N E W S

Uttaranchal may be expanded
From Gobind Thukral

PANTNAGAR, (Udham Singh Nagar), July 29 — Consensus may be emerging on the vexed question of the merger of the district of Udham Singh Nagar in the proposed hill state of Uttaranchal, with a Bill proposing creation of the new state due to be debated in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday.

Both sides, the hardy Punjabi farmers and other settlers who oppose the merger and the hill people from Kumaon and Garhwal, the big gainers in creation of the hill state, are veering around to the idea that similar contiguous areas from the districts of Saharanpur, Bijnore, Shajahanpur, Moradabad, Bareilly, Pilibhit and Rampur be made part of the new hill state.

A cross-section of those who met the committee under Union Defence Minister, Mr George Fernandes, Punjab Chief Minister, Mr Parkash Singh Badal and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister, Mr Ram Parkash Gupta, who was represented by Uttar Pradesh BJP president and Irrigation Minister Mr Om Prakash Singh today, were of this view.

The three-member committee was virtually besieged by milling crowds opposing the merger. Those in favour of Udham Singh Nagar being part of the hill state also spoke in great detail with the committee but in a separate hall, to avoid possible clashes. As it was, the district administration had a tough time controlling the crowds although the sprawling green campus of the premier agricultural university had been converted into a virtual police camp for the panel's visit. Dr J.B. Singh, University Vice-Chancellor was at hand to help the leaders meet opinion makers and the general public. Mr Badal, who had struggled hard to make the committee pay at least one visit was happy that the people had at last been heard.

Farmers, traders, industrialists and politicians cutting party lines and business interests argued that the proposed new state should not be a pauper. It was also clear that local Congress Lok Sabha Member and former UP Chief Minister, Mr N.D. Tiwari who had opposed the merger of other areas in the hill state, had not sensed the pulse of the people of the area. But state BJP leader Mr Om Prakash Singh told TNS, he had some reservations on expansion of the state. ‘‘We wish to have further talks in this matter. We heard the people today. If changes are to be effected in the resolution passed by the Uttar Pradesh Assembly then it will delay the Bill as all sides shall have to be consulted afresh. But people do not want any delay in the matter," he said.

The settlers, who softened their stand and agreed to the merger in return for expansion of the state had three main reasons to offer to the committee. One was economic. The present areas in the proposed state have a tax revenue of the Rs 350 crore and no state could exist with such meagre resources, leaders of the Congress, BJP, Samajwadi Party and traders and farmers said. Out of this Rs 100 crore comes from Udham Singh Nagar district alone which has 380 modern rice mills, 12 sugar mills besides several khandsari units etc. This prosperous middle class was not happy at its inclusion in the district as it fears heavy taxation to finance the new state. "We could be ruined by the rabid hill people who are already threatening to take away our farms’’, said Mr Daljit Goraya of the Samajwadi Party.

He was supported by scores of other including former Minister, Mr Samarpal Singh and Mr Rajinder Rastogi. The majority view was that the new hill state should have more sources of revenue if it was to develop. ‘‘How can you develop with an economy based on salaries and pensions, the mainstay of the people of the hills,’’ they said forcefully.

Another argument was political. At present the population of the proposed state is 70 lakh in which US Nagar with its 15 lakh people would be politically marginalised by hill people. If other areas are included in the state the balance would be restored.

While local BJP leaders openly supported this move here the state BJP leaders developed cold feet in committing themselves on the issue as elections are due in UP next year.

The question of contiguity and cultural affinity also cropped up. Udham Singh Nagar has major highways which separate three UP districts and the new hill state would have a porous border that could be a problem for times to come.

One common refrain in the bagful of memorandum that the committee collected was " We are so very different from the hill people". Punjabis, Haryanvis, Bengalis alike had opposed the merger, although the local MLAs and Zila parishad chairmen were unimpressed by their logic. "This is an absurd argument in a diverse country like India’’, said Mr Baba the local MLA. Also there was some dispute on how many panchayats favoured merger and how many opposed it.

With limited time and as tempers rise over the issue the committee will have to act quickly. However, neither Mr Fernandes nor Mr Badal indicated that a decision was imminent. Instead they admired the consensus and the frank talk, and said it was still not too late.
Back

 

US Nagar people ‘disappointed’
Tribune News Service

NEW DELHI, July 29 — Mr B.S. Ramoowalia, MP and president of the Lok Bhalai Party, in a statement yesterday voiced serious concern of the people of Udham Singh Nagar in UP over the exclusion of this district from the hill state of Uttaranchal as proposed in the Bill introduced in the Lok Sabha on July 25.

He said, the local people were disappointed that the three-member Central Committee had not held even a single meeting during the past one and a half years despite their protestations and were also critical that this committee had betrayed their cause by deliberately neglecting this issue of life and death concerning one million people for political considerations.

The committee with Mr George Fernandes as its Chairman and the Chief Ministers of Uttar Pradesh and Punjab as members was set up with a specific term of reference to ascertain the views of the local people by visiting Udham Singh Nagar and to submit its findings before the government could introduce a Bill in the Lok Sabha.

Mr Ramoowalia said as per available statistics, 93 per cent of the local population of Udham Singh Nagar district was non-hilly, comprising mostly Punjabi Hindus, Sikhs, Bengalis,Tharu and Bugsha tribes, freedom fighters, people from eastern and western UP and that 305 out of 327 gram panchayats, trade unions, beopar mandals, rice mills associations, kisan unions were opposed to their merger with Uttaranchal.

Mr Ramoowalia said the District Raksha Samiti of Udham Singh Nagar was disillusioned over the dubious and insincere stand of the Akali Dal and its leadership. In order to expose the Akali Dal and convince the people of Uttar Pradesh and Punjab about the rightful claim of Udham Singh Nagar to remain within UP and mount pressure on political parties the LBP had been waging a relentless struggle.

Mr Ramoowalia regretted that the stand of the Congress on this vital issue was also very disappointing. He recalled that the Congress had a history of ascertaining and upholding the views of the people in the matter of reorganisation of states. Now the Congress was playing to the BJP gallery.

The committee is now scheduled to visit Udham Singh Nagar on July 29, but it had on purpose restricted its visit to Pant Nagar only, a far-flung hill area and a safe haven for the "hilly people".

Mr Ramoowalia hoped that the committee in its wisdom would view this issue objectively, without any bias, and not betray the sentiments and aspirations of one million people of Udham Singh Nagar.
Back

Home | Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial |
|
Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune
50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations |
|
120 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail |