Govt amends CVC ordinance
Non-bureaucrats included
NEW DELHI, Oct 28 (PTI)
Setting at rest the controversy generated by an
ordinance issued in August to constitute the Central
Vigilance Commission (CVC), the government has
promulgated another ordinance to make the commission a
four-member body that will now include non-bureaucrats.
The government also
dropped from the August 25 ordinance, which had made
commissioners post open only to bureaucrats, the
"single directive" provision by which it was
mandatory for any investigating agency to seek permission
of the competent authority before launching probe against
officials above the rank of joint secretary and other
high-ranking bank and public sector officials.
The CVC (amendment)
ordinance promulgated last night also omitted the post of
ex-officio member of the commission given to the
Secretary Personnel to the Government of India,
Attorney-General Soli Sorabjee submitted before a
three-judge bench headed by Mr Justice S.P. Bharucha.
The bench after hearing Mr Sorabjee, who earlier had said
that he was for fine-tuning of the ordinance, said
"we are satisfied with the changes brought in by the
government".
The objections to the
ordinance, which was raised by amicus curiae Anil Divan
during the hearing of Rs 1000 crore Indian Bank scam,
stood addressed, Mr Sorabjee said.
The CVC (amendment)
ordinance was submitted today before a three-judge bench
of the Supreme Court comprising Mr Justice SP Bharucha,
Mr Justice GT Nanavati and Mr Justice BN Kirpal.
The court had taken strong
exception to these three provisions in the ordinance
after objections were raised by amicus curiae Anil Divan.
The bench satisfied with
the changes incorporated by the government in the
amendment made to the CVC ordinance closed the chapter
and said it would resume hearing on the Indian Bank scam
case on November 18.
Attorney-General Soli
Sorabjee submitted that by the amendment that the
vigilance commissioners could be selected from among
experts from financial field including those in banking,
law, vigilance and investigations.
This amended provision
made it clear that the commissioners could also be from
fields other than bureaucrats, Mr Sorabjee stated.
He said in the four-member
commission there could not be more than three persons
either from the bureaucrat or non-bureaucrat category.
The governments volte face
came shortly after the transfer of Enforcement Director
MK Bezbaruah was revoked after the Supreme Court during
the proceedings of the same Indian Bank scam and
subsequent appointment of the Chief Vigilance
Commissioner.
The court had expressed
concern over the revival of the single
directive which it had questioned the functioning
of the CVC and its proceedings could not be challenged
due to the non-appointment of three Vigilance
Commissioners in its Jain-Hawala judgement had quashed
the single directive.
Amicus curiae in the case,
Anil Divan, had said the ordinance limited the
appointment of the CVC only to IAS officers disregarding
both law commission guidelines and the apex courts
directive in the Jain hawala case.
Mr Divan had said the Jain
hawala judgement "clearly mentioned the panel could
be from civil servants and others. The Law
Commission draft also clearly contemplated
others being considered. Yet the ordinance
confines the choice to civil servants".
He had contended during
the last hearing that the ordinance by conferring
original powers for investigation on the CVC has left
open a dangerous scope for the commission to
"interfering with the normal powers of investigation
by the normal investigating agencies".
"What was clearly
contemplated by the judgement was that the role of the
CVC was superintendence by a single the CVC of impeccable
integrity. This idea was discarded and jettisoned",
the amicus curiae had lamented.
Mr Divan had said
"Secretary of the Ministry of Personnel at present
held by Arvind Verma has been made ex-officio member of
the CVC. This is the department which controls the CBI
and is under the PMO.
"Unlike the other
Vigilance Commissioners he (Verma) does not have to take
oath of office, does not go through the selection process
and is a member of the commission though not a Vigilance
Commissioner", Mr Divan had said.
|