|
An Indian
attachment
By
Darshan Singh Maini
THE world of love and romance and
sexuality has had a primordial fascination for man, and
each country, nation or race has scores of such fables
and stories to feed the imagination of both the lords of
life and the dreaming kitchen-maids. Indeed, such
chronicles of erotic love often acquire strange and
fabulous dimensions en route, and begin to inveigle the
minds of the youth into arbours of fantasy, reveries and
sweet fancy. In other words, such exotic indulgences
could be styled as the "wilding" of the
imagination, and in proportion as the "fairy
tale" or love-tragedy becomes a part of the
corporate cultural consciousness, it holds and compels in
that measure. And if such a story has the elements of
wonder, disbelief and incredibility, it seems to exercise
a greater spell.
The story Im going
to tell hasnt the grandeur or awesomeness of the
classical love romances, but its intriguing enough
to engage the modern imagination, and suggest the poetry
of the human heart when polarities a young British
woman architect and an unlettered, uncouth Sikh youth
from the Punjab countryside collide, as it were, in a
Calcutta gurdwara and achieve a consummation quite beyond
their own ken. Its not a romance that would make a
Bollywood extravaganza, for in some respects its
too earthy, too confined to give the imagination a large
play. But since it happened not in some remote period of
history, but around the time of Punjabs slide into
terrorism and tragedy, its appeal needs to be understood
partly in terms of the Freudian romance. And I hasten to
add that there are no overt political overtones in the
tale, though, as we know, politics of a messianic nature
have a way of reaching down to the grid of sexual of
power.
However, before I revert
to the story told in utter sincerity and authenticity by
the "heroine" of this extraordinary
extravagance, Sarah Lloyd, in her book, An Indian
Attachment, I wish to touch upon the deeper and
universal aspects of certain types of emotional or
passinate infatuations. To begin with, we may remember
that the orient has had a mysterious, arcane and
primordial affection for a certain type of Western mind
for centuries, a thing well-documented in a rash of
diaries, travelogues, novels, philosophical and religious
dissertations. And this fascination has a paradigmatic
character certain aspects ranging from the mystic
and the subliminal to the exotic and the erotic have a
way of pulling the "pilgrim" imagination. Thus,
The Passage to India (from Whitmans poem) to
EM Forsters celebrated novel) is, at bottom, a
quest for the distant and the unknown, a romantic drive
into the heart of a mystery beyond the bounds of
positivist or pragmatic thought.
Where the quest is for the
essence of reality as envisioned in oriental
philosophies, religions and practices as, for instance,
in the novels of Herman Hesse, the sexual side is
subsumed to become a constitutive part of the visionary
hunt. His Siddhartha does that in a subtle,
aesthetic manner. But where, hungers of the heart or the
foraging fires of sexual romance become the theme, the
elements of the irrational and of the inexplicable, or of
the ineluctable, alone make a sense of an otherwise
enigmatic tale. And in this connection. Im reminded
of a fascinating definition of poetry given by the great
Irish poet, W.B. Yeats. "The muses", he wrote
in A Vision, "resemble women who creep out at
night and give themselves to unknown sailors and return
to talk of Chinese porcelain." That, indeed, is the
deepest mystery of sex its sudden and perilous and
compelling deviations into the forbidden gardens of the
golden fruit. Sarah Lloyds "affair" with
her Jungli, as she lovingly called him does carry
echoes of an Edenic romance though it all turned to ashes
in the end. The union of the cultured and civilised with
the wild and untamed is to be found in the Western tales
of passion also.
The story, for instance,
of the high born Kathy and that wild demon lover
Heathcliff, a waif of the dark moors and marshes, a son
of the raging storms and rugged cliff in Emily
Brontes immortal Wuthering Heights, comes
under the rubric of such ordeals of the imagination of
the three archetypal aspects sexual love
sacred-cosmic-elemental, romantic and married the
first answers to the description of hierogamous marriage.
To quote Evelyn J. Hinz, "The paradigmatic marriage
for archaicman is the hierogamy, the sacred marriage, and
the prototype of the sacred marriage is the union of
earth and sky." It appears to me that the
Sarah-"Jungle" plunge into the deep waters of
sexuality had ingredients of the union in question. That
it turns sour in the end robs it of the power and glory
that normally belong to such "attachments".
Hence, the broken nature of this modern romance.
An Indian Attachment opens
like a novel, and the aim is to create an ambience of the
place, person and poetry of the moment. A Sikh temple of
worship in Calcutta in that hour with its utter
simplicities and aura of holiness, is the unlikeliest
place for an ordained rendezvous of this kind. Its
almost a sudden meeting on some other planet. Sarah
Lloyds epiphonic moment of destiny arrives as
though in a dream.
"He sat
crossed-legged in a brown blanket. It was a powerful face
that instantly registered fine mouth and skin the
colour of almonds. And there was Jungli sitting on
his blanket with his long black beared of the tenth Sikh
Guru and the eyes of Buddha sweeping up at the
corners...."
And as Lloyd proceeds to
map out the inscape of a British female consciousness,
and the progress of her roused soul as it responds to the
strange, exotic attraction of a youthful Sikh male in
piety and plumage, the resonances begin to gather a hum
of meanings. It was, as she tells us, a sad face, lit up
from within, and suggested an infinite tenderness. It may
be of interest to some readers that D.H. Lawrence had at
one time wanted to call Lady Chatterley Lover, "Tenderness".
That too is a story of the sexual congress of two
wildernesses, one a lady and the other a gamekeeper.
There was, no way she could resist surrender. To quote
her again," I was transfixed. I could no more avert
my eyes than the enchanted sailors could cease gazing at
the mermaid on the rock......I wondered how I was ever
going to live without him...".
From the metropolitan
Calcutta, a massive metaphor for the complexity, misery,
populousness and gigantism of the Indian scene to a
Punjab village in the back o beyond is something so
utterly baffling as to demand a huge leap of the
imagintion. And thats precisely, what the British
woman valiantly tries to achieve in the midst of cultural
shocks and confusion and chaos. And soon her story
becomes IPSO FACTO, a keen-eyed, clear, emphathetic
portrait of a Sikh home and a Punjabi village.
The village life where she
lives under the roof of the Junglis parents
simple, honest, God-fearing souls at once
charms and distresses her. While "a Flemish tapestry
of English wild flowers" cannot but please the
senses, she is quick to see a certain beauty and
blessedness in the midst of "honest" dirt. In
that Jat household where they live as an unwedded couple,
it was difficult to negotiate a passage to the peace her
spirit sought. But the Junglis parents did
not allow their religious sentiments to block the vision.
Nor was the foreign syndrome "allowed to distress
the imagination. Though Sarahs English eye is
disturbed to see tawdriness of calendar art and of other
country baubles and gewgaws, the cool, kutcha mud-house
and its functional layout and beauty do not fail to
please the architectural eye, while she pricks up a few
Punjabi phrases soon enough, her experience and her
commerce are "largely sensory."
Few foreign writers have
had the will to immerse themselves so lovingly in the
diurnal, unhurried rhythm of rural life in Punjab. She
describes in full measure the drama and the dialetic of
family feuds, codes and country protocols. The new kitsch
culture is contrasted with the deep structures of life
still in tune with nature. The only thing that does
disconcert her reticent English sensibility is the long,
lustful staring of men, and the amused, quizzical, gaze
of womenfolk in general. Nor is she upset to learn that
her noble savage had once been, before he
became a Nihang, a small-time, opium-eating smuggler who
had spent a four-year jail term in Pakistan.
Somehow, nothing in his sad, skimpy, unpleasant
past can disturb her faith in the beauty and generosity
of his spirit. Theres a certain magnanimity about
him, and an aura of deep compassion.
As we draw to the close of
Sarah Lloyds fascinating narrative, we know things
are not going to turn out according to the story-book in
the end. The Junglis shifting to a Sikh dera
in UP, and the distressing scenes of cupidity,
religiosity and fake "gurudom", eventually
break the long spell. She finds herself choked in that
regimen of cunning, vice and deceit, though even then she
does not miss those radical and soulful aspects of
Sikhism which have made it a modern religion with a
strong egalitarian and humanistic world-view.
Thus, it would have been a
miracle if in the end she had not abandoned her Jungli,
and gone back to her 17th century cottage in
Herefordshire. As she wrote "It seemed to me that Jungli
and I were no longer being vitalised by each
other". At any rate, Sarah is not Lawrences
"woman who rode away" into a haven of
wilderness and oblivion out of some deep and dark
desperate in her unconscious. Despite her compelling
romantic urges, and her desire to get away from the fuss
and frills of modern European life, and from a life of
the needling mind and the restive intellect to the
sensuous apprehension of reality somewhat in a Keatsian
vein, shes the type that is destined to return to
the greener pastures at home after a big
"browse" abroad.
And this leaves us musing
over the poetries and the perversities of the female
heart. Theres no doubt about her deep and desperate
"attachment". So long as her experience and her
vision last. Could she be, however, at a deeper level,
deceiving herself? Who can tell? As Joseph Conrad affirms
repeatedly in his fiction, theres no deception more
artful and destructive than self-deception!
What has become of this
tale, true in seed, leaf and branch, since The Return
of the Native, I do not know. How has her Jungli fared
after that separation, living perhaps in a glass-house of
nostalgic memories, or perhaps come out of them, thanks
to his Punjabi sense of reality and robustness, is a
question too deep for musings. In its uncertainty perhaps
lies its truth, its meaning.
|