BOOK REVIEWS | Sunday, July 19, 1998 |
||
spotlight today's calendar |
Punjabi Literature by
Jaspal Singh Billing earns top billing Avtar Singh Billing has made a name for himself as a short-story writer ... Politics as it is practised The Insider by P.V. Narasimha Rao. Viking, India. Pp 767. Rs 695. This Kings stories are a riddle Wizard and glass by Stephen King. Hodder and Stoughton, London. Pp. 340. Rs 2,000. |
Mind your Vedic language The Vedic Language and Exegesis by Ram Gopal. Spellbound Publications, Rohtak. Pp. 228. Rs 400. Plurality, tolerance are the soul of Hinduism Hinduism: The Eternal Tradition (Sanatana Dharma) by David Frawley (Vamadeva Shastri). Voice of India, New Delhi. Pp. 261. Rs 100. |
Punjabi literature Politics as it is practised |
Mind your Vedic language The Vedic Language and Exegesis by Ram Gopal. Spellbound Publications, Rohtak. Pp. 228. Rs 400. THE author, Ram Gopal, is a former Vice-Chancellor of Maharshi Dayanand University (MDU) and an eminent scholar of Sanskrit. He had been Kalidasa Professor of Sanskrit and head of the department of Sanskrit, Panjab University. He has devoted most of his life to study and do research on Vedic literature. The Vedas are unquestionably the earliest extant books of the human race. They represent the unfolding of the human mind in the earliest stages of thought. The orthodox Hindus regard the Vedas as revealed scriptures, the gospel given by God, perfect knowledge in arts and sciences. The Sanskrit language is called geer vani or the language of the gods. Vedic Sanskrit is quite distinct from classical Sanskrit as we know it, of which Valmiki, author of the Ramayana, is the first poet. The Vedas have four divisions namely, the mantras (verses or poetry); Brahmana scriptures which are voluminous commentaries or elucidations of Vedic rituals; aranyakas or the forest lore (ancient sages meditated on God all their life in the calm of the jungle); and the Upanishads or Vedanta representing the highest philosophy. Swami Dayananda recognised only the mantra portion as the Vedas; our author regards all the four as part of the Vedas. One uniqueness (among many) of the Vedas (mantra portion) is that despite their hoary past. They are totally free from any addition or literary corruption. In comparison, the Mahabharata which, according to its author Veda Vyasa, had 24,000 verses has more than one lakh verses today. Vedic rishis use even common vocables in a metaphorical, enigmatic style (gods love equivocation and abhor direct statement), on which each scholar puts his own interpretation with the result that there is never unanimity or finality. For unlocking the meaning of the Vedas, grammar is most indispensable. Our writer authored Vedic grammar in two volumes for which he was deservedly honoured. The most authentic commentator of the Vedas (among the old guard) is Sayana. He was Prime Minister of the Vijayanagaram empire. He collected eminent scholars and prepared his celebrated commentary. Swami Dayanand, who wrote his own commentary and debunked Sayanas interpretation, was also a great grammarian; his guru ran a grammar school at Mathura. Ravana was also a commentator of the Vedas. Cramming some important mantras (for yajna, etc) is believed to confer great spiritual merit and help in the fulfilment of wishes. In fact the western approach is that the gods (Indira, Agni, Vayu, Sun and all the 33 gods of the Rig Veda represent different phenomena) of nature, whom the earliest Aryans worshipped for personal good, victory over the enemy and their own happy life. According to some western researchers, Agni Vaishvanara was the leader of the Aryan immigrants to India. Those panegyrics of the gods got associated with certain yajnas (sacrifices), though in some cases there was little connection between the two but the process was sanctified by tradition and convention. Modern Indian researchers employ the method of scientific analysis and critical study. In the early 19th century, when Vedic studies began in the West, the British empire (like the sun) shone over the five continents and the imperialists could not reconcile themselves to the thought that a slave people had achieved spiritualism and philosophical heights undreamed of by them. Rudolf Roth, the first and foremost of European scholars, says: A qualified European is better able to arrive at the true meaning of the Rig Veda than a Brahmanas interpretation. Another western Indologist characterises the Vedic seers as barbarian priests, invoking barbarian gods. Swami Dayanand put the age of the Vedas at 197 crore years, the start of the universe. The westerners did the opposite, Max Muller dated them at 1200-1000 BC while Jacobi spoke of 300 BC. A dozen chapters of the book under review discuss the meaning of Vedic words such as daas, varna, jaar, jani, duhitar, etc. To take a few examples: the heading of one chapter is manusha. In common view, the word means a man, a human being or a member of humanity. But that is not research or erudition. Our author quotes six commentators Griffith, Geldner, Grassimar, Sayana, Vainkata, Madhaveshwara, and Shakalya and dozens of texts. The lay reader is confused, though the scholar revels in it. Manusha (man) occurs in connection with three rivers of Haryana (the Drishad Vati, the Saraswati and the Aparya). So it should be a geographical term. At this spot Indra won a wrestling match with man. (What a great victory for Indra!) The Mahabharata speaks of the Manusha Lake, a black deer bathing in this lake became a man. The epic also calls it Madush (dont pollute its holy waters). Take another chapter heading Tarkshya, a Rig Vedic deity invoked with Indra. Yasha (the magic name which sends a thrill among scholars), the author of Nirukta, who explains each word through etymology, gives three alternate meanings. Uvat and Mahidhara, also great Vedic commentators, explain it as a bird. Another scholar identifies it with Vishnu; another with the sun or the horses of the sun. It could mean vayu (wind), the velocity of which cant be checked. You are free to accept any meaning. To a critic such hair-splitting sounds pointless; to a scholar, it is the be all and the end all of research. Another chapter is Jarah Kaninam (jaar or yaar means a paramour), lover of maidens. Agni is a jaar, where maidens lose their maidenhood after sitting near the nuptial fire. Sun is the jaar of usha (dawn). Usha is a young lovely girl. Another chapter deals with the Vedic words daasa-varna. Varna could mean the four castes. Varna is colour; the white-skinned Aryan immigrants as against Krishna (black) aborigines. It is not generally remembered that both Vedic Sanskrit and classical Sanskrit were once the spoken language of the people. And a living organism grows and evolves. Our author expounds three stages in the evolution of Vedic Sanskrit the earliest stage of the Rig Veda; the middle stage of some Vedas, aranyakas and the early Upanishads and the final phase of the rest, including the later Upanishads. This is a unique contribution, though it may leave a modern man unexcited. The author has put in monumental labour in this work of fundamental scholarship. The common reader will only get confused and lose the little certainty that he has. To the scholar and the researcher, it is the book. It is a work of a scholar, by the scholar and for the scholar. P.D. Shastri |
Plurality, tolerance are the soul of
Hinduism Hinduism: The Eternal Tradition (Sanatana Dharma) by David Frawley (Vamadeva Shastri). Voice of India, New Delhi. Pp. 261. Rs 100. After a study of some forty years and more of the great religions of the world, I find none so perfect, none so scientific, none so philosophical, and none so spiritual as the great religion known by the name of Hinduism. The more you know it, the more you will love it; the more you try to understand it, the more deeply you will value it. Make no mistake; without Hinduism India has no future.... If Indias own children do not cling to her faith, who shall guard it? So wrote Annie Besant, the Irish woman who founded the Home Rule League and Theosophical Society in Madras and presided over the annual session of the Indian National Congress at Calcutta in 1917. The early western perceptions of Hinduism were, however, different ranging from a description of it as pure paganism (like in Abbe Dubois writings) to its denunciation as barbarous and horrendous in nature (in William Bruton and Pierre Martins works). When Ziegenbalg expatiated on Hindu ideas, customs and ceremonies, he was told by his Protestant patrons not to while away his time with studying pagan nonsense. The Evangelists spread the word that the Hindus were a fiendish race who committed heinous acts in the name of religion. Some Jesuits argued that the religious ideas of the Hindus were derived from the books of Moses and other apostles such as St Pantaenus. But this view could not hold ground for long. Holwell, an 18th century British indologist, for example, contended that the mythology as well as the cosmogony of the Egyptians, Greeks and Romans had been derived from the doctrines of the Hindus, and that the religious beliefs of ancient Europeans were based on the later perversions of Hinduism. Although the researches of Sir William Jones, Charles Wilkins and others proved that Hinduism was neither derivative nor a bundle of fables and superstitions, the tirade of Evangelicals and Utilitarians against the ancient religion of India continued unabated. Yet the inquisitive scholars found in Hinduism a comprehensive and ennobling tradition. While delivering a course of seven lectures to the ICS candidates at the Cambridge University in 1882, Professor Max Mueller observed that the Aryans of India were the framers of the most wonderful language, the Sanskrit... the fathers of the most natural of natural religions, the makers of the most transparent of mythologies, the inventors of the most subtle philosophy and the givers of the most elaborate laws. After the conclusion of the Worlds first Parliament of Religions in which Hinduism was ably represented by Prof Chakravarti, Narasimhachari, Lakshmi Narain and Swami Vivekananda, among others, Merwin Marie Snell (President of the scientific section of the Assembly) unequivocally stated that there was very little of profound thought and aspiration in Christendom which could not be traced to one or another of the successive influxes of Hindu ideas either to the Hinduised hellenism of Pythagoras and Plato, to the Hinduised Mazdaism of the Gnostics, to the Hinduised Judaism of the Kabbakists, to the Hinduised Mahomedanism of Moorish philosophers, the Hinduised occultism of the Theosophists, the Hinduised socialism of the New England Transcendentalists and the many other new streams of orientalising influence which are fertilising the soil of contemporary Christendom. Such being the antiquity and the richness of Hindu tradition, it is strange that it is still being distorted and misinterpreted. David Frawley, Director of the American Institute of Vedic Studies, intends to set the record straight in this book by distinguishing between the quintessence of Hinduism and how it is understood in the modern world. The book delineates the perennial wisdom of Sanatana Dharma (in common parlance, Hinduism), taking up in its gamut such aspects as the worldview of Hinduism, its development through the ages, its peculiarities vis-a-vis other religions, its philosophy and ethics, its perceptions on reincarnation, medicine, astrology and the occult, the raison detre of idolatry and rituals and the future of Hinduism. Besides, it attempts to answer common questions about Hinduism. David Frawley regrets that a Hindu is painted in the West as a particular ethnic type born in India who believes in caste and untouchability and who is socially, economically and culturally backward. The truth, however, is that he belongs to an eternal tradition which upholds truth and righteousness, which is rooted in rita and dharma, which does not confine itself to one prophet or messiah, one holy book or one Church, which is evergrowing and evergreen. This holy tradition is not limited to a particular spiritual path, name, form, person or group as in the case of other religions. Rather it accepts all spiritual paths as leading to the same goal. It believes that each human soul is free to choose its course and move in accordance with its natural proclivities. The eternal tradition of Sanatana Dharma holds that Truth is beyond limitation; it cannot be monopolised by anyone as it is a matter of direct experience. Hinduism has been regarded as the richest cluster on the variegated tree of human religion. The Jesuit scholars who made an appraisal of Hinduism in the 1960s observed that the whole of mankind can be proud that in India the human quest for truth has been so diversified and unrelenting.... plurality and tolerance appear rather as the true ornament of Hinduism. Corroborating the assessment, Frawley asserts that Hinduism contains the greatest diversity and freedom in the spiritual life that can be found in any of the religions on the planet. The Divine can be adored in any name or form or beyond form. God can be seen as father, mother, brother, sister, friend or master; in everything that exists, and in ones own self. Frawley rejects the colonialist and the missionary view of Hinduism as primitive, barbaric, polytheist, immoral or oppressive. It is not an ethnic belief system which started in a particular age but goes back to beginningless time. It is not only the oldest of all the religions but also the newest; the reason being that it has been recast by living sages during the course of history. The western mind has tried to reduce religion to a particular name and form... It has tried to compartmentalise Hinduism as a religion the way Christianity and Islam appear to be seeking to find in all religions a particularized belief system. Frawley regards the word Hinduism as a misnomer and a foreign invention since it is not mentioned in any of the classical texts. It is rather a geographical expression as it identifies the region from which western cultures have contacted it. As Sanatana Dharma or the universal tradition, Hinduism does not need to represent itself as one religious identity as opposed to others. Religious exclusivism and the infallibility syndrome in matter of beliefs about the sacred have generated acerbity and led to conflicts. In this context, Frawley raises a number of questions which have clear answers. Why should God have only one son? Why should there be only one messiah for all times to come? Why should there be only one religious book when any number of such books are possible? Why should God be addressed in the masculine sense when he is beyond gender? Can conversion bring about an overnight change in a persons psyche? And so on. Frawley presents Hinduism as a multidimensional tradition that no form of linear thinking, whether scientific or theological, can grasp. It is a vibrant ocean of spiritual, religious and occult insights and practices woven into a vast culture. It has the complexity of life itself which cannot be reduced to a formula, understood in a single book or controlled by any church or organisation. The charge of idolatry has been a convenient stick to beat Hinduism with all through history. Christianity, Judaism and Islam dub idolatry as evil and hence sinful. It is said to be indicative of a lower degree of intelligence or civilisation. Swami Vivekananda was the first Indian to argue at the Chicago Parliament of Religions that image worship was not to be derided as it helped one to meditate on the Supreme. He also referred to the deeper psychological implications of iconolatria by observing: We can no more think about anything without a material image than we can live without breathing. And by the law of association the material image calls up the mental idea and vice versa. Frawleys justification of idolatry rests primarily on two factors the universality of this practice in almost all religious traditions, including the Buddhist, the Taoist, the Catholic, Shinto, Greek Orthodox, Native American, African and Asian, and the utility of image worship in helping a devotee to approach the invisible and transcendental reality by way of supreme devotion. Frawley contends that Protestant Christians and Muslims who are opposed to idolatry, practise it nevertheless. Many Protestants have a picture of Christ or at least wear a cross which is obviously a usage of images and symbols. Muslims pray only in the direction of Mecca which limits the Divine to a particular place. Many Muslims pray at the tombs of their saints, have pictures of their religious or political leaders (like worship of Ayatollah Khomeni in Iran), circumambulate the Kaaba seven times, (anti-clockwise) and kiss the black stone each time they pass it. Frawley regards this as a worship of objects. The idolatry of the word, idea, name, or book is perhaps the worst form of all idolatries. It confuses reality with the most empty of things, a mere verbal representation. Frawley ruefully maintains that the charge of idolatry against Hinduism is often levelled as part of a campaign of conversion, invasion and conquest. It has been used as an alibi for smashing statues, robbing and demolishing temples, for plunder and genocide, all conveniently done in the name of God. The irony of the matter is that different parameters are employed when religious images are judged. They are called icons and classified as works of art when they are a part of the Christian tradition. But they are dubbed as idol born of primitive beliefs when they are part of non-Christian traditions. An image of Krishna as the good cowherd is on a par with that of Christ as the good shepherd... To make one into a superstitious idol and the other into a sacred image is hypocritical and intolerant. Frawley regards the use of images as an artistic approach to the divine. Images are the great archetypes of life, the embodiment in form of the great truths of the Eternal! Those who condemn their use betray their ignorance of symbolic language. Hinduism regards all forms of art music, dance, poetry, sculpture, painting, architecture, etc. as different languages which can be fruitfully employed in the worship of the divine. Frawleys answers to questions about Hinduism are noteworthy for their profundity and succinctness. They cover a wide range of themes from God, non-duality, atheism, the Divine Mother, the origin of Sanatana Dharma and the importance of scriptures to evolution, karma, prarabdha, evil, heaven and hell; from yoga, Vedanta, meditation, self-inquiry, self-surrender and service to tantra and mantra, ayurveda, astrology and the esoteric importance of temples. It also brings into focus the Hindu view of theology, ecology, economics, proselytisation and religious fundamentalism. Such questions as should Hindus be more aggressive or become missionaries; how can Hindus function as minorities in Islamic countries or why did the Pope condemn yogic practices, have also been brilliantly answered. David Frawley deserves appreciation for so eloquently putting forth the quintessentials of Hinduism and for lambasting the detractors of the eternal Indian tradition (sanatana dharma). Written in a simple, lucid style, it should be compulsory reading for students and scholars of religion. Satish K. Kapoor |
This Kings stories are a
riddle Wizard and glass by Stephen King. Hodder and Stoughton, London. Pp. 340. Rs 2,000. Stephen King fans would love this book which brings all his schlock together. Everything that they had loved in his earlier writings is present here. The heroes, grossness, the simplistically phantasmagoric worlds, the simplicity of plot and the ability to tell a story so simple that a school kid with little verbal felicity would be able to understand it. Those new to the Kingian style of story telling will find it intriguing and beguiling. Their wonderment as to how any one could read such a story may even carry them to the end of the book simply by the curiosity to see how King is able to weave a long story out of such thin threads of action and thought. The story begins with Roland of Gilead, son of Steven, and his newly found friends riding a coach travelling at the speed of sound. The coach is under the control of a computer lispingly called Blaine. Blaine apparently has been able to destroy most of the world by bringing it under control. Now Blaine is bored. The only way it can drive away boredom is by solving riddles. Anyone who rides Blaines coach has to give it riddles to play with. Blaine kills anyone whose riddles are solveable. Correspondingly any unsolvable riddle would kill Blaine. Blaine may be brainy, but is made up of whirls and clicks and lights in the manner of the ENIAC of old. King then tries to entertain his readers for a long time with riddles. After a while you begin to wonder whether one of his aims also is to fill up more pages of his novel. What has four wheels and flies?. The garbage van, What has four legs in the morning, two in the afternoon and three at night? A man. The riddling game goes on for many pages with the characters calling each other Sai, apparently a gender neutral variation of Sir. Having answered all the normal riddles, the computer finds it difficult to answer riddles like Why do police lieutenants wear belts? To hold up their pants. The killer was the answer to Why did the dead baby cross the road? It crossed the road because it was stapled to the chicken. Having defeated the computer, through such American high school humour, the characters continue in search of their unholy grail, the dark tower. The dark tower is the root of all evil. Meanwhile, like the reader of this book, they too get bored. At that point the main hero, Roland, begins to narrate the curious story of one of his earlier life. This story occupies most of the book. It concerns Roland when he is 14 years old and espies his mother with her lover. His father gets so upset that instead of doing anything to the transgressor, he sends the son into exile. In exile the son reaches a place where most things are post-modern. They live a horrid life of mental, financial and technological poverty and weirdness. This is a world beyond the times of electricity and petrol and is governed by a Mayor and advised by witches, all of whom are under the control of Magician and a Dark Tower. In this world, the Mayor does not sleep with his wife but is constantly in search of a nubile virgin; the wife cohabits with one of the Mayors servants. The witch finds the Mayor the nubile one. Who in turn is put off at the prospect of hearing the creak of the Mayors bones on marriage night. The Mayor is over 60 years old. The willful virgin, all of 17, bumps into the exiled hero and ceases, many times over, to be a virgin. That brings a catastrophe over the Mayors land and the girl is burnt at the stake while Roland escapes to continue with his adventures. In the interim, we have an aunt keeping a hawkish eye on the girl to keep her pure for the Mayor, a witch who peers into a pink coloured crystal ball to see all that is bad in the world and sucks her cats fur when she is pleased, the Mayors rightful wife who drinks umpteen bottles of liquor, and some boring description of the mutant animals which populate this world. A recall of this tedious love story seems to refresh Roland and his companions who now enter into a Wizard of Oz kind of world and have a few more adventures. In the end, however, they are not able to find the Dark Tower. As I said in the beginning, the usual admirers of Kingss story-telling would love this one too. Kavita Soni Sharma |