Navy chief's
suggestion 'not binding'
NEW DELHI, Dec 25 (PTI)
With the unprecedented controversy over the
appointment of Deputy Chief of Naval Staff (DCNS)
continuing, official sources today said the Defence
Ministry had serious reservation over the contention of
the Navy chief that all senior-level appointments must be
made on his recommendation.
Serious difference of
opinion erupted with Navy chief Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat
declining to implement the December 9 order of the
Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) clearing the
name of Vice-Admiral Harinder Singh for the post of DCNS.
The sources said the rules
of promotion provided for recommendation of the Navy
chief for appointment of officers of the rank of Captain
and above but stressed that such recommendation need not
be binding.
"Otherwise the ACC
would be reduced to a rubber stamp", they said.
The crisis arose with
Admiral Bhagwat asking Vice-Admiral Madanjit Singh to
function as DCNS for the past 10 months without any
government confirmation and not concurring with the ACC
decision to install Vice-Admiral Harinder Singh in the
post.
Defence Minister George
Fernandes has already expressed concern over the row and
said "it has to be settled within the ministry and
the government".
The ministry, meanwhile,
has also to take a decision on a statutory complaint of
Vice-Admiral Sushil Kumar, former Vice-Chief of Naval
Staff, who has been transferred to Cochin as Chief of the
Naval Training Command. Three other statutory complaints
filed by senior officers are also pending.
The sources said that the
officer wrote to Admiral Bhagwat thrice seeking a
suitable post in one of the two operational commands
after the government decision to raise the retirement age
across the board by two years earlier this year. The
operational Western Command and Eastern Command are
located in Mumbai and Visakhapatnam, respectively.
As he received no reply,
Vice-Admiral Sushil Kumar, now the seniormost contender
for the post of Navy chief, moved the statutory complaint
airing grievances against the naval headquarters and
observing that despite his seniority, he was at present
the training command chief which in effect came under the
Western Command. Flag Officer Commanding-in -Chief of
Western Command Vice-Admiral Madhvendra Singh is junior
to Vice-Admiral Sushil Kumar by two years.
On the controversy over
the appointment of DCNS, the sources said going by the
precedent in the past 10 years, the seniormost among the
contenders was recommended for the post of DCNS.
They said no supercession
had taken place in the past one decade and there was
nothing on record against Vice-Admiral Harinder Singh.
On the issue of
Vice-Admiral Harinder Singhs complaint in the
Calcutta High Court earlier this year that injustice had
been meted out to him at the hands of the Navy chief, the
sources said the court had directed that as the issue
involved the Navy chief, he should not examine the matter
and instead it should be looked into by the Defence
Ministry.
Accordingly, the Defence
Ministry examined the complaint and expunged the adverse
remarks against the officer.
The sources pointed out
that Admiral Bhagwat, as Rear Admiral, had filed a writ
petition in the Bombay High Court in 1990 over an
appointment issue contending that "appointments to
decision making higher command posts have always rested
on the principle that while the Chief of Navy Staff may
recommend, it is the government at the level of the
Defence Minister/Appointments Committee of the Cabinet
which must exercise its judgement/decide and put its seal
of authority based on certain principles, norms and
criteria like merit-cum-seniority....."
Admiral Bhagwat had then
submitted that within the constitutional and
administrative structure, senior appointments should not
be left to the arbitrary choice of the Navy chief.
|