What lead to
Academy flare-up
From
P.P.S. Gill
Tribune News Service
DEHRA DUN, Dec 5
What was projected as a rampage against Guru Ram Das
Academy here on December 2, basically turned out to be an
ownership dispute over "20 bigha zamin" vacated
by Tibetans.
What heated up the
atmosphere is the involvement of certain local BJP
politicians out to grab the vacated property for which
the Academy has claimed to have paid Rs 10 lakh to the
Tibetans.
The target of the local
grabbers was not the Academy premises but the newly
acquired land around which the Academy had built a
boundary wall to establish its ownership.
Inquiries reveal that
parties to the acquired land do not possess title deeds
establishing their ownership rights. But that is a
different matter.
What spoiled the
atmosphere and disturbed the academics was when a mob
carrying lathis and weapons raided and went on the
rampage. Considerable damage was inflected on the
building in the area vacated by the Tibetans. However, no
damage has been done to the main building of the Academy.
But the net result of this ugly incident has created a
hurt feeling among the local Sikhs and has shaken up the
Academy staff and students.
As a consequence of the
December 2 incident, the students are in a grip of a
fear-psychosis. There is an eerie silence. Tell-tale
signs of damage done to the property are visible all
over. The presence of policemen around is of little
comfort and consolation to the Academy staff and
students. A feeling of insecurity prevails in the
Academy.
The incident does infringe
on the security rights of a minority community but does
not, seemingly, impinge on its religion nor any religious
connotations should be attributed to the happenings.
Says Academy's Director-
Principal, Waryam Singh: " Nearly a 200-strong mob,
carrying lathis and weapons raided the campus on the
afternoon of December 2 around 1.10 p.m. It went on the
rampage, ransacking doors, windows, cupboards,
flower-pots and the Academy's stores, scattering
students' belongings all over. The securitymen were
beaten by the mob. Even two staff members, Navtej Gill
and Harbans Singh, were manhandled.
"In the melee a
"nishan sahib" was uprooted and damaged by the
hired elements. Some Sikh literature, studies and books
were torn and burnt. All this created panic. When
confronted, the mob leaders used abusive and threatening
language.
"Frantic efforts to
contact and call the police were made. It did arrive,
eventually, but to no avail. It was a mute spectator. It
sided with the hooligans".
"Asked to name those
suspected of involvement in the attack, the Director
alleged men like Mr Harish Sehgal, Mr Surinder Aggarwal,
Mr S.R. Nautiyal (he is president of the Zila Panchayat),
Mr Rajinder Shah, MLA, and others were involved in the
attack.
From the circumstantial
evidence and the look of the dilapidated building, the
prime target of the mob, it is apparent, was the
"nishan sahib" which was uprooted. Since there
is no gurdwara, no desecration of the holy Granth Sahib
took place. Thus there are not many subscribers to what
the Academy Chairman, Mr Raja Singh told Akali Leaders in
New Delhi on December 3, as reported in a section of the
press.
When the police was asked
about the two incidents, the uprooting of the
"nishan sahib" and the destruction of holy
books, the Superintendent of Police, City, Mr Ashok Kumar
Raghav, mockingly asked "Where is the nishan sahib
usually put up? Why was it hoisted on a disputed
property? Was there a Gurdwara?"
Later, the district
magistrate, Mr P.K. Mohanty, and the SSP, Mr Anand Kumar,
denied any disrespect to the holy book. "No
religious issues are involved. It is a pure and simple
case of property dispute. Neither side, claiming to own
the land, has, so far, shown papers to prove their
respective claim. We want to see who has the ownership
title and in whose name mutation has been done. The
revenue record will determine the ownership. It is for
civil court to decide", said Mr Mohanty.
The TNS team sat through
while the district magistrate first met a deputation of
the Academy and later the BJP men, including Mr Sehgal,
Mr Nautiyal and their lawyer, Mr A.S.Bindra. Neither side
could show the relevant papers to prove their ownership
claim.
Mr Mohanty told TNS that
in view of the sensitivity of the matter (and since it
had found an echo at the national level) the
administration had decided to "attach" the land
under Section 146 of the Cr. PC. The two parties were
issued notices and the police has filed a report under
Section 145. This means the disputed property will be
taken over by the administration till a court decided the
case. Pending the final outcome, as to who should finally
get possession of the land, such an arrangement is
expected to cool passions.
The issue has found a
mention in Parliament. There has been condemnation from
various quarters. The SGPC is reportedly sending a team
to assess the situation. The Akali leadership has got in
touch with the BJP allies in New Delhi and the U.P. Chief
Minister, Mr Kalyan Singh , has been asked to
"intervene".
Slogans raised by the mob
and linking of the incident to the Akalis' opposing the
inclusion of Udham Singh Nagar in Uttaranchal shows the
psyche of the BJP leaders and the hired men. These are
dangerous signs.
The city, in general, went
about its business as usual with no tension. One did hear
voices that such an incident if not handled with
political maturity and administrative firmness, fairness
and in a spirit of complete neutrality (which is missing)
the whole thing could snowball into a major
religio-political controversy.
Aware of such a fallout,
both Mr Anand Kumar and Mr Mohanty told TNS that adequate
police was being deployed to maintain law and order to
ensure peace. But the experience of the TNS team is
different. After a round of the Academy as the team moved
to the old building surrounded by a handful of policemen
and hired men of the BJP leaders loitering there, it was
physically stopped. The team was not allowed to take
photographs or see the damage. Even before TNS could
argue with them one of the hired man dialled a number on
his cell-phone. On the line was Mr Nautiyal. Despite
being told who we were, he passed orders to his men
"dhake de kar inko bahar nikaldo" (push them
and throw them out). The TNS was threatened with dire
consequences in the presence of the police, which
remained unconcerned.
The attitude of the SP
city, Mr Raghav, was no better. When all this was brought
to his notice and the request made to be allowed to go to
the actual place of happening, he developed cold feet and
dithered.
The administration has
registered two FIRs (first information reports); one on a
complaint from Ms Lata Gupta, Estate Manager, of the
Academy and the other from Mr Harish Sehgal, who claims
ownership.
The first FIR (No. 234/98)
is against Mr Sehgal and Mr Surinder Aggarwal, who have
been charged with "criminal trespassing" and a
"raid" on the Academy. It lists following
Sections under the IPC: 147, 148, 323, 379, 427, 452,
447, 448 and 506.
The second FIR (no.
233/98) is against Mr Raja Singh, Chairman of the GRD
Academy. It covers such Sections as forgery, fraud and
threat to life. The Sections include 420, 468, 471 and
506.
Mr Anand Kumar said no one
had been rounded up or arrested from either side. While
it is for the court now to decide about the
"real" owner, the Academy has in its possession
a "sale deed" it executed with some persons who
were said to be the descendants of the original owners
whose names appear in the revenue record. This was done
seven years ago. But mutation has not been done.
The other party alleges
that Mr Raja Singh is in the habit of
"grabbing" land by putting up "nishan
sahibs".
The present tussle started
no sooner the disputed property was got vacated from the
Tibetans, who had been occupying it for several years.
The Academy "negotiated" and a handsome sum of
money Rs 10 lakh, was paid. After this Mr Harish Sehgal
became active. Any involvement, therefore, by him and
others would have involved the Tibetans which was avoided
as a tactical move. The Academy meanwhile got the land
bulldozed and constructed a boundary wall reportedly with
the orders of the Civil court.
The present episode may
cast a shadow on the Academy's founder's day on December
30.
The land under dispute has
a prime location. Its market value is around estimated at
Rs 2 crore.
Dehra Dun has nearly 200
educational institutions, including about 65 such
academies, to which students flock from all over.
"Land gabbing is a common crime and an organised
mafia operates", disclosed the District Magistrate.
The Academy's Board of
Directors includes Mr Raja Singh, Capt Amarinder Singh,
Mr Ruskin Bond, Mr Kawaljit Singh, Maj-Gen A.S.Pathania,
Dr Amrik Singh and Mr Akal Singh of the USA.
The Academy has a student
strength of nearly 450, out of which 100 are girls.
Nearly 70 per cent students are non-Sikhs. There are 80
NRI students all from different religions and
communities.
The Academy was
established in 1989. It is being run by an educational
trust in the name of "Guru Ram Das. It has a 6.5
acres campus, situated 9 km from here on the
Rajpur-Mussoorie road. Located in the foothills of the
outer Himalayas, surrounded by deep forest this lovely,
peaceful place has now sent tremors all around.
|