Hindu marriage not valid till performed with apt ceremonies: Supreme Court : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Hindu marriage not valid till performed with apt ceremonies: Supreme Court

Says it’s sacred, shouldn’t be trivialised as ‘song & dance, wining & dining’ event

Hindu marriage not valid till performed with apt ceremonies: Supreme Court


Tribune News Service

Satya Prakash

New Delhi, May 1

Emphasising that a Hindu marriage is a sacred institution which should not be trivialised as a mere social event for “song and dance” and “wining and dining”, the Supreme Court has said that a Hindu marriage is not valid unless performed with appropriate rites and ceremonies such as “saptapadi”.

Certificate not enough

Mere issuance of a certificate by an entity in the absence of the requisite ceremonies will neither confirm any marital status nor establish a marriage under the Hindu law. —Supreme Court Bench

“Unless the parties have undergone such a ceremony, there will be no Hindu marriage according to Section 7 of the Act and mere issuance of a certificate by an entity in the absence of the requisite ceremonies having been performed will neither confirm any marital status to the parties nor establish a marriage under Hindu law,” a Bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice Augustine George Masih said.

“A certificate of marriage is a proof of validity of Hindu marriage only when such a marriage has taken place and not in a case where there is no marriage ceremony performed at all,” it added.

The Bench declared a purported “marriage” solemnised between a man and a woman from Bihar on July 7 invalid despite there being a marriage certificate on the grounds that the necessary rites and ceremonies for a Hindu marriage in terms of provisions of Section 7 of the Act were not performed. It also declared the marriage certificate as “null and void”.

After obtaining a marriage certificate, they had planned to get married as per Hindu rites and customs on October 25, 2022. However, before the actual marriage, differences emerged between them and they filed matrimonial cases against each other. The “wife” had moved the top court seeking transfer of cases from Muzaffarpur to Ranchi.

In its April 19 order, the top court quashed all cases.

The top court deprecated the practice of young men and women seeking to acquire the status of being husband and wife to each other and therefore purportedly being married, often for visa purposes, saying in the absence of a valid marriage ceremony under the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a marriage registration certificate would not be valid.

“We note that parents of young couples agree to register a marriage in order to apply for a visa for emigration to foreign countries where either of the parties may be working “in order to save time” and pending formalising a marriage ceremony. Such practices have to be deprecated,” it said.

“What would be the consequence if no such marriage is solemnised at a future date? What would be the status of the parties then? Are they husband and wife in law and do they acquire such status in society?” the Bench wondered.

“We urge young men and women to think deeply about the institution of marriage even before they enter upon it and as to how sacred the said institution is in Indian society. A marriage is not an event for “song and dance” and “wining and dining” or an occasion to demand and exchange dowry and gifts by undue pressure leading to possible initiation of criminal proceedings thereafter.

Noting that “a Hindu marriage is a samskara and a sacrament which has to be accorded its status as an institution of great value in Indian society,” it said, “Children born out of a valid Hindu marriage are legitimate and therefore they have full rights in law.”

In the context of “saptapadi” in a Hindu marriage, it said “according to the Rig Veda, after completing the seventh step (saptapadi), the bridegroom says to his bride, “With seven steps we have become friends (sakha). May I attain friendship with thee; may I not be separated from thy friendship”.

The Bench said, “A wife is considered to be half of oneself (ardhangini) but to be accepted with an identity of her own and to be a co-equal partner in the marriage. There is nothing like a “better-half” in a marriage but the spouses are equal halves in a marriage. In Hindu law, as already noted, marriage is a sacrament or a samskara. It is the foundation for a new family.”

About The Author

The Tribune News Service brings you the latest news, analysis and insights from the region, India and around the world. Follow the Tribune News Service for a wide-ranging coverage of events as they unfold, with perspective and clarity.

#Supreme Court


Top News

Bibhav Kumar repeatedly attacked me with full force: Swati Maliwal in FIR in assault case

Bibhav Kumar repeatedly attacked me with full force: Swati Maliwal in FIR in assault case

Maliwal was constantly ‘screaming’ for help but Kumar did no...

Ghatkopar hoarding collapse accused brought to Mumbai, to be produced in court

Ghatkopar hoarding collapse accused brought to Mumbai, to be produced in court today

Was apprehended from Udaipur in Rajasthan on Thursday

Air India flight from Pune collides with tug truck before takeoff

Delhi-bound Air India flight from Pune collides with tug truck before takeoff

Emergency protocols are swiftly enacted, ensuring the safety...

India’s economy to expand by around 7 per cent this year, country getting more investments than China: UN expert

India’s economy to expand by around 7 per cent this year, country getting more investments than China: UN

The mid-year update of the World Economic Situation and Pros...

Senior UN, Indian embassy, Israeli govt officials pay homage to ex-Indian Army officer killed in Gaza

Senior UN, Indian embassy, Israeli govt officials pay homage to ex-Indian Army officer killed in Gaza

His mortal remains are on their final journey to India, the ...


Cities

View All